<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: snow leopard and aperture &#8211; a quick glance UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diode.tv/blog/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-and-aperture-a-quick-glance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diode.tv/blog/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-and-aperture-a-quick-glance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://diode.tv/blog/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-and-aperture-a-quick-glance/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diode.tv/blog/?p=525#comment-82</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ve read your work-around but I would muck prefer that Apple get this resolved.&quot;
Believe me John, so would I. 

As to going back to Elements: the two apps are very different beasts that cater to very different needs. You could always use Aperture and round-trip to Elements for your printing needs - which would create either a psd or tiff file but that wouldn&#039;t be any different from using Bridge within Elements itself. That way you could still use both Aperture&#039;s adjustments and organization features.

Really looking forward for a serious fix soon though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ve read your work-around but I would muck prefer that Apple get this resolved.&#8221;<br />
Believe me John, so would I. </p>
<p>As to going back to Elements: the two apps are very different beasts that cater to very different needs. You could always use Aperture and round-trip to Elements for your printing needs &#8211; which would create either a psd or tiff file but that wouldn&#8217;t be any different from using Bridge within Elements itself. That way you could still use both Aperture&#8217;s adjustments and organization features.</p>
<p>Really looking forward for a serious fix soon though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John R Howarth</title>
		<link>http://diode.tv/blog/2009/08/31/snow-leopard-and-aperture-a-quick-glance/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>John R Howarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diode.tv/blog/?p=525#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I have exactly the same problem.  No matter what I do Aperture thinks I am using Roll Paper and so thinks there is a problem.  Result... no prints.

I&#039;ve read your work-around but I would muck prefer that Apple get this resolved.

To add to the problem I have only just started using Aperture.  I found it rather over whelming at first and now I can&#039;t even get my photos printed.

Seriously considering going back to Photoshop Elements.  At least that works.

Best regards,

John H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have exactly the same problem.  No matter what I do Aperture thinks I am using Roll Paper and so thinks there is a problem.  Result&#8230; no prints.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your work-around but I would muck prefer that Apple get this resolved.</p>
<p>To add to the problem I have only just started using Aperture.  I found it rather over whelming at first and now I can&#8217;t even get my photos printed.</p>
<p>Seriously considering going back to Photoshop Elements.  At least that works.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>John H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
