It’s been a verrrrry long time coming. But having spent the past hour playing around with the new version of Aperture, all I can say is: thank you. My stubbornness feels completely repaid.

This upgrade adresses everything that was lacking and adds a ton of features, big and small. It’s as though Apple actually read every article, blog and  forum post about Aperture 2, made a checklist of everyone’s wishes and added them one by one. But the amazing thing about this new release is they’ve managed to add all these while keeping the UI just as streamlined and refined as before – in fact it’s cleaner and easier to read.

I’m not going to go through everything so I strongly encourage you to look at the new online tutorials and extensive feature list. But here’s a quick rundown of my favorite new stuff.

destruction be gone

Ok, name the key feature every Aperture user has been asking for since Lightroom 2′s release?  Yup: non-destructive local editing.

Well, every single adjustment brick in Aperture 3 now offers non-destructive local editing via the new Brush tool. You can paint an adjustment in or out using the same tools as the previous Dodge and Burn plugin (brush, feather and erase). Once you’ve applied localized editing, a new brush icon appears on the brick – clicking the icon brings the Brush HUD back for further tweaking.

Beyond the main adjustment bricks, you can also access brushes for individual adjustments (Dodge, Blur, Burn, Color etc). These then appear in the Adjustments HUD like any other brick and you can change the amount of effect applied. This is all in real-time, non-destructive and it flies.

The other huge change regarding adjustments? We can now duplicate any brick. Combined with the new brushes feature this means we now have something akin to layers within Aperture itself. This opens up a whole new world of possibilities.

Current plugins still require the creation of a TIFF or PDS file though. I don’t know if third-partys will have access to APIs allowing non-destructive editing – it would be pretty huge, but I’m not holding my breath. Still, I have a feeling my use of plugins or round-trips to Photoshop is about to diminish substantially.

full screen. all the time.

There are a lot of nice UI touches in Aperture 3 that give it even more polish than before. But the one I’m most excited about is the new Full Screen mode. I always loved full screen mode. But in my day to day workflow it was rarely used, mainly because I kept having to go in and out of it all the time – no longer. Apple have made Aperture 3′s full screen mode more productive than ever with new browser and project views, a navigation toolbar and a refined thumbnail view.

It is really, really nice.

real life printing

The print dialog has received a massive overhaul: picture packages, autofill multiple shots according to size, brightness, saturation and contrast adjustments, the list goes on. For instance, I can now skip the book tool and create a contact page template complete with logo, title, subtitle, watermark and my choice of metadata – all within the print dialog. This is going to be a huge timesaver.

it’s the little things

Small details count. Because little things tend to add up. I use a lot of Smart Albums but often find myself having to go back to a picture’s original project. In Aperture 2 I had created a metadata view assigned to Tooltips (T) that included the file’s path so i could at least find out where the picture was located in the database. Every time I used it I wished for a “Reveal in Project” command. Every single time.  So I was ecstatic to find out Aperture 3 now had a command called… yes: Reveal in Project!

This is just one little thing. But man, am I ever happy about it.

labels! flags!

Yes. We can now assign labels and flag photos. No more weird keywords meant solely for organizational purposes appearing on Flickr. There were workarounds (custom metadata views) but this is welcome indeed.

faces, places, movies, fast switching libraries etc…

All These are just the tip of the iceberg. I could write ten pages on the new features and possibilities in Aperture 3. I haven’t talked about Faces and Places, the new book plugins that allow the use of the book tool with third-party suppliers, tons of refined metadata tools, IPTC compliance, fast switching libraries, searchable project description fields, Flickr and Facebook integration, a slideshow editor that’s essentially a built-in iMovie complete with video and audio, refined import panel, and presets…. oh! goodness… PRESETS!

Needless to say this is a milestone release that  - in my humble opinion – leapfrogs Lightroom by several meters at least. I’m pretty sure Adobe are scrambling right now. If they aren’t they’re being complacent.

I for one am glad I didn’t jump the fence. Lightroom? What’s Lightroom?

P.S. My library has just finished upgrading. It took several hours but everything seems in the right place. It’s now performing a face detection operation. I’m going to let it work and see how it goes. Hearing my new iMac’s fan for the first time (!)

Apple – Aperture – Pro performance with iPhoto simplicity.

Two words: non-destructive :-)

For the past year – and more so these past months – the debate has been raging around Aperture and Lightroom, mainly from AP2 users who feel abandoned by Apple. The silence surrounding a new version of the application has been deafening, forcing a lot of users into the arms of Adobe for many reasons that have been discussed to death at this point. If you read this blog you know I’ll be sticking it out unless physically booted out of the Aperture camp.

There are a lot of technical reasons for my decision. I’ve mentioned them in other posts. But one thing that never seems to enter the debate is something less tangible: the fact that software can be an instrument in its own right.

flugelhorn?

I’m not talking about software as a tool mind you, but as an instrument. Like a violin, a piano or a… flugelhorn?
You see, through all my experimentation with various incarnations of Lightroom one thing has always been quite clear: I get very different results than I do with Aperture. Some of it has to do with my varying comfort level between the two apps. And some of it is purely technical, differences between RAW converters and such. But I’ve also come to believe that software – creative software – has a footprint and flow that affect the output. Software has tone.
I’m a musician. My guitar is a Fender Stratocaster. Everything about this instrument impacts what I do with it: the neck, the spacing betweens frets, how the body feels in my hands. All these design choices mould the way I use the guitar. In fact, over the years they’ve moulded the way I play guitar. I’m now convinced Aperture shapes my photography in pretty much the same way.
In the great debate between Lightroom and Aperture we seem to forget that they each have a very specific signature. The philosophical differences in design, the choice of available effects and the way they’re applied all contribute to shaping pictures in a very distinct way. In my mind they’re not instantly interchangeable, as many seem to imply. This, I think, is why I’m having such a hard time contemplating a switch. I’m not so sure I want to change oils for water-colour, Strat for SG.

the homogenous pool

Why do we feel this need for one app to rule them all? If everyone uses a brush, isn’t there a case to be made for using a palette knife? Ok, it’s not as clear cut as that. These applications can obviously be twisted and turned in ways that can make them much closer to each other in the end. Plugins are certainly an equalizer. Same goes for round-tripping to external editors.

But right now I can’t help looking at my choice of Aperture as a plus, something that puts me in a particular mindset that’s philosophically different from a Lightroom user. I see my photography in another context, I use other tools that work in other ways, I interface with my work through another window. Interface as zeitgeist so to speak. I’m not trying to delude myself into being some sort of rebel soldier either – I’m simply contemplating my choice beyond keywords, metadata and organization.

full of what?

I know, maybe I’m full of it. Just rationalizing my decision to stick with Aperture. But perhaps I’m on to something. Perhaps software design has become a much more intricate part of our creative process than we give it credit for. Perhaps it impacts our vision and field of view as well.

And perhaps I can wait a little longer.

But I wonder at what point those of us using Aperture have begun suffering from Stockholm Syndrome, and are defending our captors rather than breaking free for greener pastures.

Full article here.

1) We can now turn Black Point Compensation back on and use paper profiles. Goodbye purple!
2) Aperture sends the right tray info to my R2880 so no more Preview workaround!!!

Number 2 had me worried: it didn’t work the first time I tried it, giving me the same wrong paper error. After cancelling the operation I went into the Print Settings in my preset and it was showing the right tray (sheet feeder). Instinctively I re-saved the preset and that seems to have done the trick. Not sure if it was a fluke or if it’ll need to be done for each preset. Frankly, I don’t care – just glad this is finally fixed.

I’ve also heard that the quad-core iMacs have begun shipping. APX for christmas anyone?

What I DO like is the fact that they’re being totally open about the process, allowing photographers to use the new tools and decide what works for them. This makes making business decisions a lot easier than the limbo Apple currently forces us to live in.

Things I really like:

• The noise reduction and basic RAW rendering looks a lot better – way better than Aperture 2, which is a big deal.
• Local edit tools seem more fluid – and the fact that they exist at all shames Aperture 2.
• History, history, history.

Not to beat a dead horse but I still don’t see myself switching to this app unless Apple drops the ball on AP3 or leaves us in the dark for another six months. Or three.

Oh! just give us something already will you?

So here’s a recap of the problems I’ve encountered and their – hopefully very temporary –  solutions.

the purple one

SOLUTION: Turn off Black Point Compensation and use your profiles as before. I’ve found that slightly boosting the gamma setting to 1.05 brings the blacks back where they should be. I use Ilford Gallery Smooth Pearl and so far my prints are dead on.

the disappearing epson options

Epson released 10.6 drivers for the r2880. I thought I was golden. But when I tried to print I found there were no print options under Printer Settings. Nothing. No Advanced Black and White, no high detail, high speed… nothing. And of course Epson were of no use, stating in their FAQ that they had left out certain features due to size constraints on the Snow Leopard disc (what??!!!!!!!). It turns out that although the drivers are 10.6 compatible, they also require Rosetta to be installed. What threw me was that I’d selected it to be installed as part of my SL upgrade but it somehow wasn’t.

SOLUTION: Install Rosetta from Optional Installs after upgrading to SL. Options in the driver reappeared without even having to restart the computer.

the epson roll conundrum

This is the big super annoying bug. It’s the one requiring the most complex workaround. When printing from Aperture with the R2880 you need to choose a paper that not only fits the intended size but also the right source (meaning the printer tray). Here’s what I mean:

Normally, choosing any name that says Sheet Feeder will instruct the printer  to use the main tray. Not so when printing from Aperture in SL. No matter what you choose the printer receives it as Roll Paper. And there’s no way to change it. Brilliant.  

SOLUTION:

1- Prepare everything as you normally would: paper size, profile, sharpening, border etc. But instead of hitting Print, choose Preview. This creates a pdf with all settings rendered and sends it to Preview.

2- Once in Preview your window contains two buttons: Cancel and Print. DO NOT HIT PRINT. You’ll get the same source error. Instead, hit command-P to get to Preview’s print dialog. Once there choose the right paper (again!) and don’t forget to (again!!) set the profile from the Color Matching section.

3- When all is set hit Print from the dialog. The picture will print normally.

When I realized I was going to be doing this for awhile I immediately created presets for every paper type and size in Preview, thinking I’d at least save myself the trouble of having to redo everything each time. Good idea. Doesn’t work: the print presets don’t remember the paper size or scaling. It does at least remember the profile. One out of three.

the wait

So here we are, unsure of what lies ahead and hoping against hope that some kind of resolution will come. Hopefully this post will help a bit in the meantime. I don’t know about you but I’m starting to feel antsy about a lot of things in Aperture Land.

This doesn’t fix the problem with Aperture printing though….

UPDATE:
I’m having serious printing problems with my Epson R2880: when trying to print from Aperture (2.1.4) any paper I choose is apparently stuck at roll paper, giving a wrong source error when it reaches the printer. I now have to hit preview, select the correct page setup and profile and print from there. So far this seems to work. But it’s a pain and not what I want to be stuck doing for very long.

I had this problem before but only when printing to Manual-Roll. Now even Sheet Feeder options don’t work. This would all be fixed if we only had a proper Page Setup option in Aperture as in every other OS X application…

There’s also a color shift problem with all my Ilford and Hahnemuhle profiles. Fortunately this is fixed by disabling Black Point Compensation as discussed  in this KB article.

But I’m now considering going back to Leopard. Not sure yet.

UPDATE 2:
I’ve now tested and confirmed that when using the Preview option the generated temporary PDF file contains the Aperture print dialog’s sharpening setup. So for now it’s a functional workaround – not elegant but functional. I’ve created presets for all my paper sizes and profiles in Preview so I don’t have to recreate them each time I need to print. Of course, they don’t appear in Aperture’s solitary little world (!!!!!). I also need to add that I hadn’t printed since the 2.1.4 update, so the culprit might be that particular update and not 10.6.

For those wondering how Aperture 2 plays with the new Snow Leopard update: on the most part it seems fine from here. In fact, it feels a tad faster on my machine especially when loading projects and launching the adjustments pane. This is with the 2.1.4 update applied when it came out last week.

I say on the most part because Full Screen mode feels a little flaky: in testing the waters I had a repeatable instance of a pretty long delay when switching in and out of it. And Expose no longer functions while in this mode either (nor does command-tab but I think that was the case before). Same goes for Spaces (which I’ve just reactivated to test under the new OS). Keep in mind that I’m running all this on an aging 2006 iMac 24 – your mileage may vary. Interestingly, I’ve just read a few reports of users with decked out recent iMacs complaining of serious slow-downs when making adjustments under 2.1.4 and 10.6. So as always make sure you have a solid backup plan if you’re installing on a production machine.

Now for those still clinging to the 1.5x iteration: sorry, time to move on. And given the immense difference in both functionality and speed between versions 1 and 2, you’ll probably regret not having made the move sooner!

Now… can we get that shiny new box with a big 3 on it?