1. Current 32 bit plugins don’t run in 64 bit: this was to be expected but it’s a pain. Aperture needs to be opened in 32 bit mode to use the current crop of plugins. So if you use any sort of plugin on a day to day basis this means no 64 bit for you (me). It probably also means we’re going to need to buy new versions of every plugin we own.
2. Faces: I was never excited about this feature and I’m still not convinced. First, it needs to scan the entire library. This,  my friends, takes a looong time on a large library. After three hours it had gone through 4000 pics (from 65000) and had made some pretty odd choices. It also crashed my iMac to the point where my main library would no longer open and had to be rebuilt. Some 30 sweat-filled minutes later, I decided to disable it altogether. Not sure it’ll come back on.
3. Flickr: this is the exact same export module you get in iPhoto 09. I was hoping to at least be able to choose from my own custom export presets (size, watermark) but  can’t. This may be fine for a consumer product but I’d expect more from a pro app. And yes, I know Flickr isn’t geared towards pros. But these days social sites are a big part of marketing  - like it or not.
4. Web Pages: no change from version 2. Same templates and layouts. Not too hot.
5. Export: no sharpening on export. I was really hoping for this one.
6. Help: the user manual is no longer a pdf but a Help Viewer (html) doc. And for some reason it’s incredibly slow. Not only am I not a fan of the help viewer, but this means I can’t put the manual on my iPod for some night reading (tried: doesn’t work).
7. Skin Retouching: most brushes and bricks are smooth as silk but this one runs like molasses. It also tends to make the skin look like chalk. Maybe I haven’t found the right settings yet but the slow speed makes it hard to experiment with.
8. On the bug front: the Blank setting on my second display doesn’t stick. It keeps reverting back to Alternate even though the menu still says Blank. Annoying.

As I said, Aperture 3 is still a stellar upgrade and an absolute no brainer. There are tons of enhancements that are truly worth the price of entry. But as expected a 3.0.1 version will be needed.

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

It’s been a verrrrry long time coming. But having spent the past hour playing around with the new version of Aperture, all I can say is: thank you. My stubbornness feels completely repaid.

This upgrade adresses everything that was lacking and adds a ton of features, big and small. It’s as though Apple actually read every article, blog and  forum post about Aperture 2, made a checklist of everyone’s wishes and added them one by one. But the amazing thing about this new release is they’ve managed to add all these while keeping the UI just as streamlined and refined as before – in fact it’s cleaner and easier to read.

I’m not going to go through everything so I strongly encourage you to look at the new online tutorials and extensive feature list. But here’s a quick rundown of my favorite new stuff.

destruction be gone

Ok, name the key feature every Aperture user has been asking for since Lightroom 2’s release?  Yup: non-destructive local editing.

Well, every single adjustment brick in Aperture 3 now offers non-destructive local editing via the new Brush tool. You can paint an adjustment in or out using the same tools as the previous Dodge and Burn plugin (brush, feather and erase). Once you’ve applied localized editing, a new brush icon appears on the brick – clicking the icon brings the Brush HUD back for further tweaking.

Beyond the main adjustment bricks, you can also access brushes for individual adjustments (Dodge, Blur, Burn, Color etc). These then appear in the Adjustments HUD like any other brick and you can change the amount of effect applied. This is all in real-time, non-destructive and it flies.

The other huge change regarding adjustments? We can now duplicate any brick. Combined with the new brushes feature this means we now have something akin to layers within Aperture itself. This opens up a whole new world of possibilities.

Current plugins still require the creation of a TIFF or PDS file though. I don’t know if third-partys will have access to APIs allowing non-destructive editing – it would be pretty huge, but I’m not holding my breath. Still, I have a feeling my use of plugins or round-trips to Photoshop is about to diminish substantially.

full screen. all the time.

There are a lot of nice UI touches in Aperture 3 that give it even more polish than before. But the one I’m most excited about is the new Full Screen mode. I always loved full screen mode. But in my day to day workflow it was rarely used, mainly because I kept having to go in and out of it all the time – no longer. Apple have made Aperture 3’s full screen mode more productive than ever with new browser and project views, a navigation toolbar and a refined thumbnail view.

It is really, really nice.

real life printing

The print dialog has received a massive overhaul: picture packages, autofill multiple shots according to size, brightness, saturation and contrast adjustments, the list goes on. For instance, I can now skip the book tool and create a contact page template complete with logo, title, subtitle, watermark and my choice of metadata – all within the print dialog. This is going to be a huge timesaver.

it’s the little things

Small details count. Because little things tend to add up. I use a lot of Smart Albums but often find myself having to go back to a picture’s original project. In Aperture 2 I had created a metadata view assigned to Tooltips (T) that included the file’s path so i could at least find out where the picture was located in the database. Every time I used it I wished for a “Reveal in Project” command. Every single time.  So I was ecstatic to find out Aperture 3 now had a command called… yes: Reveal in Project!

This is just one little thing. But man, am I ever happy about it.

labels! flags!

Yes. We can now assign labels and flag photos. No more weird keywords meant solely for organizational purposes appearing on Flickr. There were workarounds (custom metadata views) but this is welcome indeed.

faces, places, movies, fast switching libraries etc…

All These are just the tip of the iceberg. I could write ten pages on the new features and possibilities in Aperture 3. I haven’t talked about Faces and Places, the new book plugins that allow the use of the book tool with third-party suppliers, tons of refined metadata tools, IPTC compliance, fast switching libraries, searchable project description fields, Flickr and Facebook integration, a slideshow editor that’s essentially a built-in iMovie complete with video and audio, refined import panel, and presets…. oh! goodness… PRESETS!

Needless to say this is a milestone release that  - in my humble opinion – leapfrogs Lightroom by several meters at least. I’m pretty sure Adobe are scrambling right now. If they aren’t they’re being complacent.

I for one am glad I didn’t jump the fence. Lightroom? What’s Lightroom?

P.S. My library has just finished upgrading. It took several hours but everything seems in the right place. It’s now performing a face detection operation. I’m going to let it work and see how it goes. Hearing my new iMac’s fan for the first time (!)

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

Apple – Aperture – Pro performance with iPhoto simplicity.

Two words: non-destructive :-)

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

Apple these days look like they’re all about consuming content. The topic even came up on the Aperture forum the other day, with some seeing this as proof that the company no longer cares about the application. When Steve Jobs presents Apple as a “mobile company” it suddenly becomes quite easy to get caught up in that mindset. But one has to remember Jobs is a master showman. This little tidbit allowed him to position the company way above some very targeted competitors.

Because while they’ve managed to become a juggernaut in consumer electronics and media distribution, I still believe their DNA is very much rooted in the creation of content. When Jobs describes his company as being “at the intersection of technology and liberal arts”, I think it goes beyond Apple the so-called gadget maker – it paints a picture of what they offer as a whole. And the empowerment of creators is very much part of that whole.

where’s my toolset?

Which brings me to the main topic of this article: the missing tools. These past few years have seen the rise of Web 2.0, the advance of Javascript libraries (both in power and speed) and now HTML 5. All these new technologies enable the creation of interactive and social content without relying on proprietary plugins – yes, I’m talking about Flash.
I was, in another life, a strong proponent of Flash. Not because I was particularly fond of (at the time) Macromedia, but because I was able as a designer to use Flash and do pretty much what I wanted visually, either in a web page or a standalone app (which I believe contributed to the demise of Director with its cross-platform nightmare). Until the advent of AS3, Flash was very empowering for designers. The WYSIWYG factor was very strong throughout the application – so much so that for years I was able to create immersive applications for extremely high-end clients with a minimal knowledge of the AS2 programming language.

I’ve now grown weary of Flash for several reasons:
- It’s a resource hog.
- It sucks on the Mac.
- It’s proprietary.
- With the advent of AS3, every new version of Flash seems to be less and less geared towards designers (I’m sorry, but I don’t want to code tweening or linking between scenes).

But the biggest reason of all: I see all that’s possible with Javascript and HTML 5. Problem? There are NO CREATIVE TOOLS out there. None. I don’t get it. Where’s Apple here? Shouldn’t they be all over this?

Here’s a pretty simple example: I’ve been looking to replace Flash on my studio site. I’m not using it out of choice but because my Photoshelter account’s embeddable slideshows are Flash-based. I love the simplicity of using Photoshelter to manage slideshows for my site, but I just don’t want Flash anymore. What I want is a photo manager that exports a custom embeddable Javascript slideshow. Can’t find one. The best slideshow manager I know is Slideshow Pro and it exports as – yes you guessed it – Flash. There are tons of beautiful Javascript slideshow solutions but all of them require manual coding. I could use JAlbum with Galleria but this creates a full-blown web page with thumbnails. I don’t want thumbnails and I don’t want to extract code every time I want to change a picture.

It’s frustrating.

the flash conundrum

Right now the hard reality is that if I want to quickly create a custom interactive application, my only choice is Flash. It’s the only environment that allows me to point on an object, assign an action and have it play back. Give me an hour and I can build a completely customized interactive web site without typing a single line of code. But of course, it’ll be a swf file. And it won’t play on an iPhone, iPod Touch or iPad
I would love to create an interactive magazine or photography book for the iPad. Something like the NYT demo but geared towards photography. I have tons of ideas. But the tools to build them are beyond me. I’m right brain. I don’t know C++ from C#. I’m a designer, not a programmer. Even though I’m geeky enough to be able to fiddle with some code, the SDK is way over my head.

touch studio pro. please.

So I keep hoping Apple are working on something. That somewhere deep in Cupertino there’s an iSomething killer app waiting for everything to be in place. That once Big Media and Big Publishing are all nice and comfy the floodgates will open, and the power to create will fall back to the individual. It could even be rolled into iWeb and be totally logical. See, I want the tools to build the kind of interactive site or application that Apple uses for itself. I want to embed a javascript slideshow on a web page by drag and drop. I want a Pages or Keynote document to which I can assign touch actions and have it run as an iPad or iPhone app. As Scott Bourne recently wrote, If iTunes or iBooks were to distribute user generated books or magazines, it could do for self-publishing what Podcasts did for radio-type content.

I want Hypercard for the iPad. I want Touch Studio Pro.

Maybe the time is near. Maybe Apple is preparing to pull out iLife and iWork 2010 with all that functionality built-in. Maybe there is a Touch Studio Pro that will allow me to export to an app, a web page or as iTunes Extras. In my mind it would make total sense. It would put a big nail in Adobe’s coffin with regards to its web stranglehold, as I’m sure many designers would jump on the opportunity.

I they build it, I will come.
C’mon Apple. The liberal arts are waiting.

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

Everyone’s talking about the iPad right now. So I’m not going to pretend I have anything to add that hasn’t already been said at some point during the last 18 hours or so. But for what it’s worth, here’s my take:

• This past year I moved my reading habit to my iPod Touch. I’m the first one to be surprised by this because I’ve always been a book junky. You know, the kind that likes the smell of books. I like how they feel, how they look in a room. I’m a book addict. But I’ve now read over 25 novels on my iPod and I’m completely hooked. So I wanted a bigger iPod Touch so I could read more comfortably. Check.

• I also wanted a bookstore that felt right and was a pleasure to browse (sorry, the Kindle App’s not it). From what I’ve seen of the iBookstore: check.

• As a photographer I’ve often used my iPod Touch to show off my portfolio to potential clients. The iPad is going to be a serious asset for this task. Check.

And that’s it. Honestly, that’s all I was looking for. Everything else is icing.
Lack of Flash? Don’t care. I was a Flash developer for a long time and now I just want to move away from it as fast as I can. I don’t seem to be alone there. I love the UI in the new apps (Calendar anyone?), I love how everything seems to flow. I love that I’ll be able to use my iPhone apps (Bento, Soho Notes, 1 Password) out of the box.

Other notes of interest:

• The custom designed A4 processor. This is the first product to result from Apple’s purchase of PA Semi and, according to John Gruber, the payoff is gigantic. interesting move for the future. Maybe Intel’s days on the Mac are counted.

• iWork. I use Pages extensively. This is a very nice surprise. I like how they’ve de-bundled the suite too.

• The potential for enhanced gesture interactions. When demoing Nova, the guys at Gameloft showed off a three-finger rotation to open up a hatch on -screen. As noted by iLounge, this is very Minority Report and could hint at an interesting future as developers start taking advantage of the technology.

And of course the price point: $499 to get your foot in the door is pretty impressive as far as I’m concerned. I paid $650 for an iPod Photo some years ago – remember those? We’ve come pretty far since then.

So naysayers aside this device has me excited because it does exactly what I needed, both professionally and personally.

I’m now waiting to be notified.

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

It wasn’t premeditated. I didn’t wake up one morning and decide to drive around with a camera in my hand. I was just stuck in traffic one day, heading for a shoot with my camera bag right next to me on the passenger seat. While waiting at a red light I took out my camera out of pure boredom – intending to snap a pic of the garbage truck in front of me – when traffic began moving again. Instead of doing the right (and safe) thing, I started firing away left and right.

When I got home I was surprised at some of the shots I had taken: there was an immediacy and a randomness to the process that had yielded quite unexpected results. For one, the mere act of driving meant I hadn’t seen everything in the frame while shooting. There’s the fact that the vehicle itself was… well… moving, with all the technical angles it implies regarding shutter speed and motion blur. And the point of view was new: how often do you get to shoot in the middle of a busy street? I was hooked.

There are several “intellectual” layers to this too: voyeurism, confinement, the hit and run nature of disappearing as soon as a picture is taken. And there’s the frame of the windshield and windows often giving a fishbowl aspect to the scenes. That’s a disconnection that I find appealing in a strange, twisted way. This is point and shoot taken to extremes.

I’ve done it a few times now and I think I have a series bubbling in the back of my mind. Not sure what form it’ll take.

I just need to watch out for tickets…

Full gallery here

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

A year ago today I was sitting in front of my television, watching history being made. A lot has changed since then and looking back,  it’s hard not to feel a tinge of sadness. Change is hard apparently.

To commemorate this day, I’m reposting through my plasma screen | a moment in history. It now all seems so very far away…

Backstory (from last year):

Mise en abime.
I wanted to be in Washington. Badly. But an expired passport and the need to oversee the end of a contract kept me at home. So I decided to use my tv as a window, a privileged vantage point. I used the 70-300mm lens I would’ve used if I’d been on location. I set ground rules for myself – no PVR, everything had to be shot live as if I was there. I used the HD feed from ABC News and got to work, reframing as I would on the street, using the tv screen as my outside world and grabbing portions of it with my lens. I made it a point to stay zoomed in to the picture, moving around as much as possible, essentially shooting inside the tv in hopes to bypass the cameraman’s original frame. The only exception to these rules is the first picture in the set: a self-portrait taken before the ceremonies began.

This is obviousky an odd point of view. It’s a camera within a camera. An eye within an eye. And while it is a poor substitute to actually being there, it’s given me the strange sense of somehow being a part of history.

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace

Great post from Zack Arias about moving into big lights:  Where Hot Shoe Flashes Dare Not Go

Tweet This Post Delicious Digg This Post Facebook MySpace