<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dual(ité) &#187; opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diode.tv/blog/tag/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diode.tv/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LR3 beta &#8211; a followup</title>
		<link>http://diode.tv/blog/2009/10/22/lr3-beta-a-followup/</link>
		<comments>http://diode.tv/blog/2009/10/22/lr3-beta-a-followup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperture 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diode.tv/blog/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright. I know it&#8217;s quick but I&#8217;ve just spent the past hour playing with the new LR3 beta and while all the core advantages from LR2 remain, it&#8217;s still no fun to work with. The interface is just as messy as before and most of the improvements &#8211; at least as far as I can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright. I know it&#8217;s quick but I&#8217;ve just spent the past hour playing with the new LR3 beta and while all the core advantages from LR2 remain, it&#8217;s still no fun to work with. The interface is just as messy as before and most of the improvements &#8211; at least as far as I can tell right now &#8211; would warrant a big point update, not sure about a whole new version. I&#8217;m guessing there&#8217;s a bit of marketing going on (which is certainly fair game, don&#8217;t get me wrong).</p>
<p>What I DO like is the fact that they&#8217;re being totally open about the process, allowing photographers to use the new tools and decide what works for them. This makes making business decisions a lot easier than the limbo Apple currently forces us to live in.</p>
<p>Things I really like:</p>
<ul>
<li>The noise reduction and basic RAW rendering looks a lot better &#8211; way better than Aperture 2, which is a big deal.</li>
<li>Local edit tools seem more fluid &#8211; and the fact that they exist at all shames Aperture 2.</li>
<li>History, history, history.</li>
</ul>
<p>Not to beat a dead horse but I still don&#8217;t see myself switching to this app unless Apple drops the ball on AP3 or leaves us in the dark for another six months. Or three.</p>
<p>Oh! just give us something already will you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diode.tv/blog/2009/10/22/lr3-beta-a-followup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
